weswoodell.com

Life, Theology & Discipleship with Wes Woodell

Hi Wes, thanks for the article. If you don’t mind, …

Comment on Q1: Should new ministers attend Bible College or Seminary? by Paul Smith.

Hi Wes, thanks for the article. If you don’t mind, I would like to offer a bit of a pushback. You said, “This goes against popular thought, but my short answer is formal education leading to a degree should not be required or expected for every young minister, and those who have degrees should not be viewed as any more competent for service than those without.” I wonder if you feel that way exclusively, or only with certain prospective ministers?

To paraphrase a good friend of mine who was speaking specifically of learning Greek, a solid degree does not give you the answer to every problem, but it sure keeps you from making some stupid mistakes. Speaking as someone on the “other” side of 50, I have had more than enough experience with young men who are full of “spit and vinegar” who make horrendous wrecks of their ministries, and sometimes of their lives, when an ounce of education could have prevented the entire disaster. A formal education is not just for book learning – it provides a maturation process that is critical for ministry (the more you know, the more you know you don’t know, and that leads to a greater degree of humility). Obviously, a braggart with a degree is bad news, and is dangerous; but character is formed long before an education is received, and a braggart with a degree was first a braggart without a degree.

Also, as one who has been involved in a university setting for the past four years, I will unequivocally say that a “high quality on-line program” is an oxymoron. On-line programs exist for one reason – money. Students have to pay less of it (supposedly) and can remain at home; universities have to pay instructors less and do not have to support the infrastructure that on-site students demand. I’ve read articles that extoll on-line programs, but the majority of students that I have talked to that are serious about their learning HATE on-line courses. They are either shell courses that require no work, or to compensate, the instructor assigns unrealistic projects. By far the worst aspect of the on-line setting is that there is virtually (pardon the pun) no interaction with the instructor and/or classmates. Learning is not just top-down – it is also bottom-up and horizontal. Remove the classroom setting and while you may accomplish a quantifiable transfer of facts, you have seriously undercut the entire process of education.

I respect your position, and in certain circumstances I would agree it could be workable. But for a young person with maybe 50 – 60 years of potential ministry in front of him, I would say invest the 4 years in a residential college/university setting to provide a foundation from which a solid ministry can be built. You can intern in a university setting – I did for all four years of my undergrad program (although, informally). Very, very, few intern settings can provide for (or even believe it worthwhile) the kind of foundation that a university degree will provide.

Thanks again for listening to a contrary viewpoint.

Paul Smith Also Commented

Q1: Should new ministers attend Bible College or Seminary?
Hey Wes, thanks for the reply. I too had an on-line course through Fuller, and my experience was that it was a place holder, an inexpensive way for us to begin the DMin process without having to make a costly trip to Pasadena. I certainly did appreciate that cost saving measure, but I honestly cannot say that I gained that much from the course.

I want to point out that your experience was at the graduate level (at least I’m pretty sure it was). I teach at the under-graduate level, and there is a significant difference in the student population of a grad program and an under grad program. And, as you pointed out, if the faculty have – as a whole – designed a solid program and curriculum, an on-line component may not be a complete waste of time. I would not trade my DMin experience for anything – but it was a typical distance learning arrangement – several weeks of intensive reading (1,500 – 3,000 pages) and paper writing, followed by either one or two weeks of intensive on-site courses (approx. 7 hours a day). I loved it.

For an academic appraisal of on-site vs. on-line spiritual formation, please read Paul R. House, Bonhoeffer’s Seminary Vision: A Case for Costly Discipleship and Life Together (Crossway, 2015). House writes as a professor and administrator, and his observations should be heard by all in Christian education. He is sharply critical of the current trends in theological training. It is interesting that as he concludes his book he writes – “If seminaries continue on their current impersonal path, and if online programs fail to deliver what is needed in the way I think they will fail, small local forms of pastoral training will emerge.” Of course, he is writing in view of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s seminary experience at Finkenwalde, and throughout the book he stresses the strict (and intensive) academic work done at Finkenwalde, but his conclusion shares some commonality with yours – closely mentored spiritual guidance in the daily work and ministry of a congregation.

Blessings,

Paul


Comments

weswoodell.com

Passionate about connecting people to Jesus?
Subscribe! 

* Get the latest posts delivered fresh to your inbox.
* Qualify for subscriber-exclusive content & freebies.

Never miss a post!

Get the latest content delivered fresh to your inbox by signing up below:

x